September 12, 2009

The Cool Box Mash Tun

About 4 years ago I decided to take up brewing my own beer as a serious hobby. By ‘serious’ I’m not talking about the 12% ABV gut-rotting death ale that many associate with homebrew, but brewing beers with faithful attention to style, strength, flavour and aroma. Beers that would stand up to my favourite commercial bitters, pale ales and stouts in terms of both taste and finish.

An early decision I made was that I wanted to brew straight from malted grains (barley, wheat, etc) rather than using tinned or powdered malt extracts. Extract brewing is perfectly respectable and a great entry-level way to start, but I felt it suited me more to dive straight in at the complicated end. However, choosing the all-grain route left me with an important requirement, I needed a ‘mash tun.’

Thermos Cool Box‘Mashing’ is the term that brewers give to the process of steeping malted grains in water at a specific temperature, activating enzymes that convert the starch in the grain into fermentable sugars. The ‘mash tun’ is the vessel in which this steeping takes place for a duration of 90 minutes, so to hold a body of liquid at such a defined temperature for this length of time would obviously require something with significant insulation. What better vessel than a picnic cool box? Just as suitable for keeping a mash at a stable 64°C as it is for keeping sandwiches and salads chilled. My cool box is a Thermos 32 litre ‘Weekender’ - the Rolls Royce of cool boxes :) - easily capable of mashing 5 kilos of grain, enough for a 25 litre batch of the good stuff.

Tap and ManifoldA couple of modifications are needed before she’s ready to go. A keg tap is core-drilled into the wall of the cool box, behind which a run-off manifold is fitted. The manifold’s job is to allow the wort (brewspeak for unfermented beer) to pass freely through the 5 kilos of grain to the tap without getting bunged up along the way, an unfortunate event known as a ’stuck mash.’ It’s made from standard copper plumbing pipe and the elbows and T-joint are solder fittings so a quick blast with a blow torch was all it took to fix it together. The crossbeam is there to increase the surface area of the manifold and the outward-turned T-joint attaches to the back of the keg tap via a hosepipe fitting and a short length of syphon tube. Finally, slots are sawed into the bottom of the manifold at 10mm intervals, at a depth of just less than half the pipe’s width. My Dad and I worked up a hell of a sweat with our junior hacksaws that day, I can tell you. Good thing we each had a bottle of Deuchars IPA to hand.

And so, tap and manifold firmly in place, (slots facing downward) the mash can begin. Water is heated in the boiler to ‘strike temperature’ (calculated to several degrees higher than the intended mash Cool Box Mash Tuntemperature, accounting for the loss of heat when the grain is added) and the grains are stirred in well to avoid clumping. If the mash temperature hasn’t been hit then either more hot or more cold water can be added to adjust. With the room already filling with a malty aroma like a cow biscuit dunked in a mug of Horlicks, the mash tun lid goes on and the whole thing is wrapped up in a thick sleeping bag for extra insulation. An hour-and-a-half later and the mash tun will be full of sweet liquid maltose (and other sugars) that the brewer’s yeast can go to town on. Mashing is only the first step along the way, of course, but one made so easy by this little DIY gem.

The bottom line is that you can mash in anything, but this set-up is extremely efficient (I’ll barely lose 2 or 3°C over the 90 minutes) and is ideal for the batch sizes I like to brew. Ladies and Gents, the cool box mash tun. Its inventor, whoe’er you may be, I salute you!

GDave

Posted at 9:00 pm in: Beverages, Brewing & Beer

8 Comments »

The RSS feed for this post is here.

  1. GDave,

    Can you brew me a natural indigo dye in that? If so, we’re in business GD….. one week ale, the next a shibori sensation :)

    Cid

    p.s. would blue beer be a problem? :)


    Comment by Cid − on Sep 13, 2009 at 10:25 pm

  2. GDave,
    Very interesting post. I must admit to some hair raising experiences at the hands of a home brew kit but yours seems more sensible and refined. In money terms is it worth the effort as a matter of interest?

    Miles


    Comment by Miles − on Sep 13, 2009 at 11:53 pm

  3. Wow, I had no idea you were a brewery chemist. Now if you’d just substitute sorghum, millet, buckwheat or brown rice instead of wheat and barley, we’d be in business.

    Sorry about the women commenters on your beer post, GDave. It is a rather manly topic. First Cid wants you to dye shibori fabric in your brew kit, then I want you to make your beer gluten-free (maybe with a hint of raspberry).

    Nonetheless, I thoroughly enjoyed this post. It was actually quite interesting, even from a non-beer drinking female point of view. You definitely have an entertaining blog. Your posts are always a joy to read.

    Good one!
    Melissa


    Comment by Melissa − on Sep 14, 2009 at 1:45 am

  4. Cid,

    I’ve heard of squid ink going into a beer recipe so it seems nearly anything goes. I’m not sure about the blue beer, though. I don’t think I’d be able to match that up on my Lovibond colour chart. :)

    GDave


    Comment by greedydave − on Sep 14, 2009 at 5:46 am

  5. Miles,

    It can get unbelievably geeky if it gets under your skin. I measure water pH, calculate mash efficiency and even work out the desired volume of carbonation in the finished beer as part of my “normal” routine.

    As for cost, I’d say I spent no more than £200 on very basic start-up equipment. There are sundries to buy now and then like cleaners and sterilisers, but the barley, hops and yeast turn out excellent beer at just under 30p per 500ml bottle. Compare that to the price of bottle-conditioned ale at the supermarket and your initial outlay is payed for after just a few 5 gallon batches.

    Of course, it only becomes a saving if you were intending to drink several 5 gallons batches of beer in the first place. :)

    GDave


    Comment by greedydave − on Sep 14, 2009 at 5:46 am

  6. Melissa,

    Absolutely! I can’t think of a better person to ask about non-glutonous options. Do any of those you mentioned have ‘diastatic’ properties? I can certainly see future experiments in the offing.

    Hmmm, beer and DIY in the same post was always a risk, but good to see yourself and Cid have risen to the challenge. Although, if I mention parallel parking as well, I’d probably give you both a case of ‘the vapors.’ :)

    Thanks mate! (yep, anyone can call anyone mate. :) )


    Comment by greedydave − on Sep 14, 2009 at 6:38 am

  7. GDave,

    Lovibond sounds like the kind of stuff theatrical folk might use with their dentures :)

    Cid

    p.s. sorry about that but you asked for it with that quip about parallel parking :)


    Comment by Cid − on Sep 14, 2009 at 3:07 pm

  8. I’m way behind again and missed this whole parallel parking exchange. Mentioning “vapors” goes in line with your notion that we have an innate inability to parallel park. That’s rubbish. Of course, I have a 4 wheel drive SUV and rather than attempting to finesse my way into a tight parking place, I just head over the curb and muscle my way into the spot. Man style! No vapors involved.

    Melissa
    :-)


    Comment by Melissa − on Sep 28, 2009 at 10:13 pm

Leave a comment